Maharashtra Political Crisis Explained Know The Reason Behind The Failure Of Uddhav Thackeray Why did Uddhav Thackeray become unfit?

Bollywood

[ad_1]

hear the news

Uddhav’s uncomfortable sub-‘status’!

There is a proverb in English, which means – People with similar interests or similar types tend to form groups. There was no difference in the attitude, thought and policy of Bal Thackeray. He also had disagreements with Atal Bihari Vajpayee on many issues, but Shiv Sena supremo Bal Thackeray gave a big place to BJP’s attitude, thought and policy.

In the year 2000s people used to say-

There was no match between Bal Thackeray’s attitude and Uddhav Thackeray’s instinct. Uddhav Thackeray’s face did not even fit into the image of soft Hindutva. He appeared like a wrong or an un-fit leader in the right party. Although he tried to roar aloud at his rallies several times – but then the same thing happened – the loud voice never went down well with his gentle personality.

On the other hand, his cousin Raj Thackeray looked like Bal Thackeray in terms of voice and style. But there is a similarity between both Raj and Uddhav. The experience of running politics, party and power is less in both of them.

Even in the era of Bal Thackeray, the Shiv Sena government used to take the words of BJP leaders seriously for political decisions. Both Pramod Mahajan and Gopinath Munde were instrumental in the political decisions of Maharashtra. Although then the Chief Minister also used to belong to Shiv Sena.

gait, face and character sense

Uddhav Thackeray lost his two and a half year old government, lost MLAs and even lost his cabinet ministers. Uddhav found a mentor in Sharad Pawar for his political decisions. Although everyone knows that Sharad Pawar and Bal Thackeray also had a close friendship. But Bal Thackeray’s attitude was different from Sharad Pawar’s and he also had his own intellect.

Despite winning the 2019 Maharashtra elections with BJP, Uddhav formed the government with NCP and Congress instead of BJP. But he could not understand one thing.

Shiv Sena’s gait, character and face – all three come from the ideology of Hindutva and nationalism. The gait, character and face of Modi’s BJP also comes from Hindutva and nationalism. BJP and Shiv Sena are like two swords in a sheath, one made of iron and the same sharp.

But Bal Thackeray and Vajpayee were wise enough to know that they were the only two swords in the world that were made to reside in only one sheath. Uddhav Thackeray took out this sword of Shiv Sena from the common sheath and hit his own feet.

Now the result is out – but the future is not over.

Disclaimer (Disclaimer): These are the personal views of the author. Amar Ujala is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness of the information and facts contained in the article. give us your thoughts [email protected] can send on Attach a brief introduction and photo with the article.

Expansion

Uddhav’s uncomfortable sub-‘status’!

There is a proverb in English, which means – People with similar interests or similar types tend to form groups. There was no difference in the attitude, thought and policy of Bal Thackeray. He also had disagreements with Atal Bihari Vajpayee on many issues, but Shiv Sena supremo Bal Thackeray gave a big place to BJP’s attitude, thought and policy.


In the year 2000s people used to say-

Vajpayee is the right man in a wrong party. This was also said because Vajpayee was always considered a soft Hindutva face.


There was no match between Bal Thackeray’s attitude and Uddhav Thackeray’s instinct. Uddhav Thackeray’s face did not even fit into the image of soft Hindutva. He appeared like a wrong or an un-fit leader in the right party. Although he tried to roar aloud at his rallies several times – but then the same thing happened – the loud voice never went down well with his gentle personality.

On the other hand, his cousin Raj Thackeray looked like Bal Thackeray in terms of voice and style. But there is a similarity between both Raj and Uddhav. The experience of running politics, party and power is less in both of them.

Even in the era of Bal Thackeray, the Shiv Sena government used to take the words of BJP leaders seriously for political decisions. Both Pramod Mahajan and Gopinath Munde were instrumental in the political decisions of Maharashtra. Although then the Chief Minister also used to belong to Shiv Sena.

Bal Thackeray also acknowledged the political skills of Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Pramod Mahajan. Despite clarifying their position on some issues, the mind of Shiv Sena and Bal Thackeray used to match the tendencies of BJP. Bal Thackeray understood this very well. It was also a testament to his political prowess. He knew that if Nibhegi will be with BJP only.

,

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.