Ind Vs Ire Analysis Team India Poor Bowling Against Ireland Deepak Hooda Century Would Have Been Useless Bhuvneshwar Kumar Turned The Match

The Indian team is at the first position in the ICC rankings. Ireland is at number 14. Obviously there can be no comparison between the two teams. In Dublin on Tuesday (June 28) in the second match of the two-match T20 series, when Team India scored 225 runs while batting first, everyone had considered the victory of the Indian team for sure. No one thought that the relatively weak Ireland team would be able to compete with India. This team of number 14 proved everyone wrong. He not only scored more than 200 runs but was only four runs away from victory.

Ireland’s batsmen brought sweat on the forehead of the new India captain Hardik Pandya. Hardik, who is captaining for the first time in this series, should have known that Team India is weak in saving runs. He batted first 25 times in the last two years and lost 14 matches. Not only this, this is the second time in the last seven matches that the opposition team has scored more than 200 runs in the second innings against India.

Batting first in the match, India scored 225 runs for seven wickets in 20 overs. Deepak Hooda scored the first century of his career. He played an innings of 104 runs. Sanju Samson scored 77 runs. In reply, Ireland scored 221 for five in 20 overs. He lost the match by just four runs. Batting first in T20, if a team scoring more than 220 runs can win the match by four runs, then its bowling will be considered weak. After scoring more than 220 runs, this margin of victory is at the second place. Earlier in 2016, the West Indies team had won the match against India by just one run after scoring more than 220 runs.
turning point in the match
Bhuvneshwar’s last over: Ireland needed 38 runs to win in the last three overs. Harry Tector and George Dockrell were batting stormy. All the bowlers of Team India were proving to be expensive. In such a situation, it seemed that Ireland’s team would upset. Captain Hardik changed the strategy and called his most experienced bowler Bhuvneshwar to bowl in the 18th over. It was his last over (4th over). Bhuvneshwar had conceded 39 runs in three overs. Hardik’s bet could also prove to be wrong.

Bhuvneshwar’s first ball went wide. On the next ball he bowled a yorker and Tector wanted to send it outside the boundary. He took a long shot, but was caught by Deepak Hooda on the boundary. Ireland’s strongest partnership collapsed. Bhuvneshwar conceded just seven runs in the over and took one wicket. From here Team India got a chance to return.
Performance of both the captains:

What went right in the match for India?

Deepak Hooda and Sanju Samson shared a partnership of 176 runs in 87 balls. Both of them took advantage of the absence of the trio of Rohit Sharma, Virat Kohli and KL Rahul and gave Team India a strong option. Now after the return of three big players, it will not be easy to oust these two. Axar Patel gave only few runs in the bowling. He conceded only 12 runs in two overs. The rest of the bowlers looted runs at an economy of more than nine.

What didn’t go well for India?
Deepak Hooda definitely scored a century, but in the end he batted slow. It could have been a loss to Team India. Hooda made the initial 91 runs in 45 balls. After that it took him 10 balls to reach 100 runs. Ishan Kishan, Suryakumar Yadav and Dinesh Karthik failed with the bat. Hardik faced nine balls, but could only score 13 runs. In the bowling, except Akshar, everyone conceded runs.

Indian bowlers performance

What went wrong in Ireland’s match?

The team’s batsmen performed brilliantly. Paul Stirling (40 off 18 balls) and captain Balbirnie (60 off 37 balls) made explosive starts. Both of them destroyed the bowling of Team India by sharing 72 runs in 5.4 overs. Harry Tector did wonders in the second match in a row. He once again impressed with his quick batting. Tector scored 39 runs off 28 balls. George Dockrell’s 34 not out off 16 balls and Mark Eder (23 not out off 12 balls) brought Ireland closer in the match.

What went wrong in the match for Ireland?
All were disappointing in the bowling for Ireland, conceding runs at an economy of more than eight. Andy McBrain 16 in one over, Conor Olfert 47 in 3 overs, Delany 43 in 4 overs, Mark Eder conceded 42 runs in 4 overs. Gareth Delany (00 runs) and Lorcan Tucker (05 runs) failed to bat. Had both of them contributed something, the result could have been different.

Expansion

The Indian team is at the first position in the ICC rankings. Ireland is at number 14. Obviously there can be no comparison between the two teams. In Dublin on Tuesday (June 28) in the second match of the two-match T20 series, when Team India scored 225 runs while batting first, everyone had considered the victory of the Indian team for sure. No one thought that the relatively weak Ireland team would be able to compete with India. This team of number 14 proved everyone wrong. He not only scored more than 200 runs but was only four runs away from victory.

Ireland’s batsmen brought sweat on the forehead of the new India captain Hardik Pandya. Hardik, who is captaining for the first time in this series, should have known that Team India is weak in saving runs. He batted first 25 times in the last two years and lost 14 matches. Not only this, this is the second time in the last seven matches that the opposition team has scored more than 200 runs in the second innings against India.

Batting first in the match, India scored 225 runs for seven wickets in 20 overs. Deepak Hooda scored the first century of his career. He played an innings of 104 runs. Sanju Samson scored 77 runs. In reply, Ireland scored 221 for five in 20 overs. He lost the match by just four runs. Batting first in T20, if a team scoring more than 220 runs can win the match by four runs, then its bowling will be considered weak. After scoring more than 220 runs, this margin of victory is at the second place. Earlier in 2016, the West Indies team had won the match against India by just one run after scoring more than 220 runs.